The financial landscape of the United States has entered a precarious phase as a recent report from Nomura Securities’ Charlie McElligott triggered waves of concern across trading floors, specifically on March 10, 2025. The market's nerves were frayed as economic indicators painted a grim picture of stagnation fears—what many now refer to as "stagflation." In a startling revelation, data showed unexpected weaknesses within the American economy, as considerable uncertainty regarding policy implementation loomed large.

The previous week had already set the tone for anxiety, when the Markit PMI for the services sector unexpectedly contracted to 48.1—a level not seen in two yearsExpectations for continuous recovery in the services industry were dashed, leading many to reevaluate the overall growth outlookAmong the troubling indicators was a drastic drop in the employment index, which unexpectedly plummeted from 58.6 to 49.3, signaling a definitive reversal from improvements seen over the previous months

Advertisements

According to Nomura’s analytical models, if service sector employment drops by just 1%, the GDP growth rate could plummet by 0.3% in the same quarter.

These subtle shifts within the labor market are reverberating through the very foundation of the U.S. economyEvery nuanced change in the employment landscape magnifies in a consumption-driven economy like the U.SMcElligott's analysis highlighted worrying parallels between the current labor market malaise and how things were in August 2024, when a surprising increase in unemployment to 4.2% and only 125,000 new non-farm jobs created signified a deepening crisis—a crisis that caused the VIX, a key measure of market volatility, to skyrocket by 47% in just one week.

Compounding the economic stress were rising inflation expectations, which aggravated stagnation fearsDespite the University of Michigan's Consumer Sentiment Index showing a consecutive three-month decline, short-term inflation expectations surged from 3.2% to 4.1%, while long-term estimates exceeded the pivotal threshold of 2.8%. This peculiar discrepancy between consumer confidence and inflation predictions has been flagged by Goldman Sachs economists as indicative of classic stagflation symptomsData reveals that the core PCE price index in the U.S. has consistently exceeded the Federal Reserve’s 2% target for five months, with forecasts from the Atlanta Fed's GDPNow model downgrading first-quarter GDP growth estimates from 2.5% to 1.2%.

As if these economic challenges weren't enough, uncertainty at the policy level has emerged as the proverbial straw breaking the camel’s back

Advertisements

With a government shutdown deadline approaching on March 14, Congress remains embroiled in a budget standoffA recent Politico poll indicated that 72% of voters perceive a government shutdown as "inevitable," with this foreseen collapse of governance beginning to infiltrate financial marketsStress tests by JPMorgan disclosed that every week a government shutdown persists could impose 0.8% downward pressure on the S&P 500 index, with the delay in releasing critical economic data poised to instigate a liquidity crisis.

Deeper within the policy framework, heightened worries are surfacingThe market is finally realizing that the government's attempts to cut spending and reduce the deficit, juxtaposed with tariffs imposed, could impose a heavier-than-anticipated drag on the economyAccording to estimations by the Peterson Institute for International Economics, the proposed budget cuts of $250 billion in fiscal year 2025, combined with the cost increases attributable to tariffs on China (which could raise average business costs by 3.5%), could result in a staggering 1.5% decrease in annual GDP growthThis "fiscal tightening + trade protectionism" combination has been classified by McElligott as "the most dangerous policy experiment since the 1930s."

The options market is reflecting these fraught sentiments, with unusual volatility confirming this climate of fearBy the market close last Friday, the skew in S&P 500 index options soared to 1.35, marking the highest level since October 2024. The trading volume of put options relative to call options reached an alarming ratio of 1.27, with transactions for various "crash puts"—those with strike prices 95% below current market levels—skyrocketing by 320%. Such behavior of "tail risk hedging" bears a striking resemblance to market activity just before the Silicon Valley Bank crisis of March 2024.

Even more troubling is the structural shift occurring within the volatility markets

Advertisements

The Chicago Mercantile Exchange’s "volatility of volatility" index surged by 21% last week, indicating an unprecedented spike in future volatility expectationsTypically, such a scenario arises during significant economic turning points, paralleling phenomena witnessed around the time of the 2008 financial crash and the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020. A derivatives strategist at Deutsche Bank commented that "current market pricing is essentially insuring against a scenario of hard economic landing coupled with rampant inflation."

The abrupt shifts in expectations regarding Federal Reserve policies are accelerating this unfolding crisisAccording to CME’s FedWatch Tool, the probability estimates for an "uneven landing" scenario—whereby the Fed cuts rates 2-4 times by the end of 2025—have skyrocketed from a mere 7% one week ago to 50% todayThis dramatic pivot reflects not only mounting fears surrounding a slowdown in economic growth but also lingering concerns about potential policy missteps by the FedWhen asked if the Fed might replicate 2024's hawkish stance, former Fed Vice Chair Lael Brainard cited the current environment as "more complex," stressing that the dual pressures of sticky inflation and slowing growth will challenge the central bank's policymaking acumen.

Global capital is finding refuge in the midst of this chaos, causing significant shifts in asset pricesSince March, the yield on U.S. 10-year Treasury bonds has retreated from 4.2% to 3.8%. Simultaneously, gold prices eclipsed the $2,100 per ounce mark, and the yen strengthened against the dollar, climbing to 108.50. This triad of stock, bond, and currency market woes resembles patterns observed during the stagflationary period of the 1970s

UBS Group's asset allocation report notes that "the current environment is prompting investors to reassess strategies that resonate with the 1970s—prioritizing holdings in gold, inflation-linked bonds, and reducing allocations to growth stocks."

Nevertheless, a divergence in market sentiment persistsMorgan Stanley's Chief Economist Ellen Zentner remains adamant that "short-term weaknesses in the services sector are merely transitoryAs the manufacturing sector stabilizes, the economy still has prospects for a soft landing." She pointed to a consistent month-on-month growth in durable goods orders over three consecutive months and early signs of recovery in semiconductor shipmentsThis perspective is gaining some traction within technology stocks, with Nvidia's shares rising 8% following unexpectedly strong earnings, while Meta Platforms saw sustained momentum driven by AI-related advertising revenue growth.

The current tug-of-war surrounding the American economic outlook is dramatically reshaping the terrain for global capital flowsSince the beginning of 2025, emerging market bond funds have attracted a net inflow of $38 billion, while U.S. high-yield bond funds have faced outflows totaling $14.5 billion.

As March 2025 unfolds, the fate of the American economy hangs precariously at a crossroads, where the quality of data is less vital than the wisdom and decisiveness of policymakersAs Nomura's report caused tumult in trading halls, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell was on Capitol Hill testifying before Congress, and every word he spoke held the potential to steer market sentiment

Advertisements

Advertisements